Skip to content
Our Standards
Something not making sense? Ask us to decode it
A mass of golden supplement capsules

A HeadLines Decoded Series

The Longevity Marketplace

At the end of September 2025, the Food and Drug Administration reversed itself on NMN, short for nicotinamide mononucleotide, one of the best-selling pills in the anti-aging aisle. Since 2022 the FDA had said NMN could not be sold as a supplement because it had first been authorized for study as a drug. The Natural Products Association and the Alliance for Natural Health USA petitioned the agency to change course, and the association sued in August 2024. The FDA gave way. NMN, it concluded, had been sold as a supplement since at least 2017, before that drug work, so it could stay on the shelf. Then, in May 2026, researchers led by Maria Trętowicz and Riekelt Houtkooper at the University of Amsterdam reported in Nature Metabolism that NAD+ in the blood did not change with age across more than 300 people, young and old. NAD+ is the molecule NMN is sold to raise. The claim that it declines as we get older sits at the heart of the sales pitch.

This series measures the distance between what gets sold and what has been shown in people. Under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, a supplement can go on sale without proving it works. Its label has to stick to careful wording like “supports healthy aging” and carry the line saying the FDA has not evaluated the claim. A drug has to prove itself first. Search online for NMN, or for senolytics, the drugs and supplements meant to clear out worn-out cells, and most of the first screen is stores and “best of” lists that earn a cut of every bottle sold. Clinics cost far more. A longevity clinic membership commonly runs from several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars a year.

Part 1 starts with that search page. Cellular senescence comes next, in Part 2: the worn-out cells nicknamed “zombie cells” that stop dividing but do not die and keep leaking inflammatory chemicals, and the reasons some of them help. Part 3 reads the human trials of senolytics. The best known is a pairing found in 2015 by a team led by James Kirkland at the Mayo Clinic, dasatinib, a prescription leukemia drug, with quercetin, a plant compound. Human studies since then have been small. One gave the pair to nine people with diabetic kidney disease, and a 2024 Mayo bone trial led by Joshua Farr enrolled about 60 women past menopause and did not meet its main goal. Those trials gave high doses for two or three days under a doctor’s watch, then a rest. Part 4 holds that schedule up against the daily capsules sold as senolytics, which usually contain quercetin or fisetin and never dasatinib.

NAD+ is a molecule every cell uses to make energy and repair DNA, and Part 5 looks hard at the tidy story that it runs down with age. Part 6 goes through the trials of NMN and its cousin nicotinamide riboside, or NR, including a head-to-head study of 65 healthy adults, published in January 2026 by a team led by Stefan Christen and Bernard Cuénoud and run at Nestlé Research in Switzerland, in which a gram a day of either one roughly doubled NAD+ in the blood within two weeks. What the trials mostly have not shown is a change a person would notice, such as stronger muscles, steadier blood sugar or a sharper memory. Part 7 follows the money to the longevity clinic. There, full-body scans and biological-age tests come bundled with NAD+ drips and off-label prescriptions, meaning drugs prescribed for uses they were never approved for.

The series is a deeper companion to our earlier one, Decode Your Wellbeing, and none of it recommends a product or a dose. If a bottle labeled NMN or “senolytic” is already in your cabinet, Parts 4 and 6 are the ones to read first, because they compare what you bought with what was actually tested in people. Questions about taking any of it belong with your own doctor.

7 parts

A series by Todd Ruffner-Schoenfeld.

Part 1 of 7 The Search Results Are the Story The same commercial forces that shape search results and supplement labels run all the way down to clinics charging five figures a year. Before the evidence, look at who is doing the talking. 10 Aug 2026 Part 2 of 7 Cellular Senescence, Explained Properly Senescent cells are often described as zombie cells that refuse to die and poison their neighbors. The biology is real. The marketing version is simplified past the point of usefulness. Here is the clearer picture. 11 Aug 2026 Part 3 of 7 The Human Evidence on Senolytics In animal studies, clearing senescent cells improved healthspan; the human evidence on senolytics is far thinner. What NAD and senolytics can and cannot do, in plain terms. 12 Aug 2026 Part 4 of 7 Senolytic Products vs. Senolytic Protocols The clinical trials used intermittent, high-dose, physician-supervised regimens of specific agents. The retail market sells daily capsules under the same label. The two are not interchangeable. 13 Aug 2026 Part 5 of 7 NAD+: Biology, the Decline Narrative, and Recent Challenges NAD+ is essential for cellular energy and signaling. The claim that it declines steadily with age and that restoring it reverses aging has driven a large market. The biology is real. The simple decline narrative is under pressure. 14 Aug 2026 Part 6 of 7 NMN and Nicotinamide Riboside: What the Trials Actually Show Oral NMN and NR reliably raise circulating NAD+ in humans. Effects on metabolic, muscle, vascular, and cognitive outcomes are mixed and often modest or absent. The gap between biomarker and benefit is the central fact. 15 Aug 2026 Part 7 of 7 Longevity Clinics and the Premium Retail Endpoint The same marketplace dynamics that shape search results and supplement claims culminate in high-priced clinics offering testing batteries, off-label prescriptions, and unproven interventions. The evidence has not kept pace with the pricing. 16 Aug 2026
The bottom line

In both halves of the series, the first step holds up in people. In small studies, short on-and-off courses of dasatinib and quercetin lowered markers of senescent cells in tissue and were generally tolerated, and oral NMN and NR reliably raise NAD+ in the blood and have looked safe over weeks to a few months. The next step, a benefit in daily life, is where the evidence thins out. No senolytic has been approved to treat aging. A 2025 pooled analysis of NMN and NR trials, led by Konstantinos Prokopidis at the University of Liverpool, found no consistent gain in grip strength or muscle mass in older adults. At the University of Delaware, Christopher Martens led a trial in which 52 older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, a mild but measurable memory problem, took 500 milligrams of NR twice a day for 12 weeks. Their blood NAD+ roughly doubled. Blood flow rose in the left hippocampus, a memory center of the brain, but their memory scores did not improve by a statistically significant margin.

Part 3 first called a 2025 phase 2b trial of a senolytic injected into the eye for diabetic macular edema, a swelling at the back of the eye caused by diabetes, more encouraging, and it now carries a correction. The trial was Unity Biotechnology's ASPIRE study of a drug called UBX1325, in 52 patients. By the company's own May 2025 announcement, the drug missed its main goal of matching the standard treatment, aflibercept, on vision averaged over weeks 20 and 24, though it did match it at week 36. In the same announcement Unity said it was laying off its entire workforce and exploring what it called strategic alternatives, such as a sale. On Sept. 18, 2025, according to the company's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, its stockholders approved a plan to dissolve Unity.

NMN's legal footing has held steady. After the September 2025 reversal, the FDA sent letters on Dec. 2, 2025, reinstating the new dietary ingredient notifications of two NMN makers, SyncoZymes and Inner Mongolia Kingdomway Pharmaceutical. NMN is now a lawful supplement ingredient, though a company putting it in a new product is still expected to file a notification first, the paperwork the FDA requires before anyone sells an ingredient that was not in supplements before 1994. We found no further FDA action on NMN this year. Separately, the FDA said in December 2025 that it is considering a rule letting the "not evaluated by the FDA" disclaimer appear once on a label instead of on every panel that makes a claim. The disclaimer itself would stay.

Part 4 turns the checking into a few plain questions. Does the capsule hold the same ingredients as the trials, at doses anywhere near theirs, taken on the same on-and-off schedule? Has this formula ever been tested in people? With NMN and NR, the matching question is whether a study showed more than a higher number on a blood test. The Amsterdam work adds a doubt. If NAD+ in the blood holds steady with age, the drop the pills are meant to fix would have to be in muscle or the brain, and a blood test does not measure those. At the clinic end, Part 7 points out that the measures with the strongest evidence for a longer, healthier life, such as controlling blood pressure and staying physically active, need no membership.

The answers will come from larger trials. Part 3 notes that bigger randomized studies of dasatinib and quercetin in Alzheimer's disease are under way or planned, and Kirkland, who has since moved from Mayo to Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles to direct its Center for Advanced Gerotherapeutics, leads the Translational Geroscience Network, which Cedars-Sinai says was overseeing nearly 90 active clinical trials as of April 2025. For NMN and NR, the open question is whether a longer trial can show NAD+ rising in muscle or brain tissue and, with it, a change people can feel, in walking speed or on a memory test.

This series was reported and edited to HeadLines Decoded newsroom standards.

Share this series

More from HeadLines Decoded